229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.53%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 5.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-16.39%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 4.78%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-66.93%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 9.63%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-66.93%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 9.60%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-11.18%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 8.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-12.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 6.22%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-11.39%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.88%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.81%
Share change of 0.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.66%
Diluted share change of 0.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.63%
OCF growth of 20.63% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
14.68%
FCF growth of 14.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
14.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 61.05%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-35.75%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 33.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-36.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.97%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1480.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 1480.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
167.38%
3Y OCF/share growth of 167.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
592.64%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
116.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 6.77%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-4.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-11.94%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-28.00%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
7.47%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
12.19%
BV/share growth of 12.19% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
0.10%
Debt growth of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.34%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
