229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.83%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Technology median of 3.33%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
5.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.87%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-92.86%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 6.09%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-92.86%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 5.87%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
50.37%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.03%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
43.18%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.82%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
48.57%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.71%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
5.63%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.83%
Diluted share growth above 2x Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.29%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-67.60%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
7.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 83.26%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-40.21%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 45.83%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-38.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 21.14%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.87%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-73.66%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.37%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
644.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 27.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 9.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
26.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 26.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.44%
AR growth of 11.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-61.11%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.70%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai sees if expansions are strategic and well-supported by end demand.
29.27%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-68.59%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
5.26%
R&D growth of 5.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
1.67%
SG&A growth of 1.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
