229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.37%
Revenue growth of 75.37% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
58.07%
Gross profit growth of 58.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
113.16%
EBIT growth of 113.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
113.16%
Operating income growth of 113.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
64.86%
Net income growth of 64.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
60.32%
EPS growth of 60.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
64.29%
Diluted EPS growth of 64.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
2.63%
Share change of 2.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.99%
Diluted share change of 0.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.10%
OCF growth of 71.10% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
65.84%
FCF growth of 65.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
26.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 84.08%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-37.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 41.19%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-14.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 18.41%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
15.32%
OCF/share CAGR of 15.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-37.83%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
213.53%
3Y OCF/share growth of 213.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
18.37%
Net income/share CAGR of 18.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-26.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 8.18%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
222.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 24.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
133.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 133.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
30.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 30.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
75.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 75.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.98%
AR growth of 30.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-25.00%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
46.99%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.70%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
38.56%
BV/share growth of 38.56% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.76%
R&D growth of 9.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
35.74%
SG&A growth of 35.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
