229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.99%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 6.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-9.56%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 5.64%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-71.19%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 5.52%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-71.19%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 5.80%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
27.32%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.40%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
26.73%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
23.91%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.00%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.70%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
2.00%
Diluted share growth above 2x Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.65%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-89.85%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
12.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 68.88%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-44.54%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 36.02%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-5.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.82%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-84.28%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
668.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 668.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-56.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
38.15%
Net income/share CAGR of 38.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
141.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 45.39%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
117.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.70%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
112.38%
Equity/share CAGR of 112.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
17.45%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 17.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
162.86%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 162.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.38%
Receivables growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-33.33%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-7.63%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-5.18%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.67%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.22%
R&D growth of 2.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-10.03%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
