229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.17%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 6.50%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-1.09%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 7.07%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
68.57%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.96%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
68.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-14.16%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 6.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-14.06%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 7.14%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-13.16%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 6.67%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.21%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-0.60%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
283.61%
OCF growth of 283.61% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
555.88%
FCF growth of 555.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
2.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 106.89%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-46.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 58.90%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-18.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 24.95%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-40.46%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
782.27%
OCF/share CAGR of 782.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
188.42%
3Y OCF/share growth of 188.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
28.19%
Net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would push for cost or revenue enhancements to match peers.
47.20%
5Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would encourage better profitability or share buybacks to catch up with peers.
399.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 30.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
112.81%
Equity/share CAGR of 112.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
11.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 11.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
171.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.87%
Receivables growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-50.00%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.07%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.14%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 1.38%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.43%
R&D growth of 5.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-3.14%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
