229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.47%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 1.94%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if this gap is sustainable or cyclical.
-14.00%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
22.03%
EBIT growth of 22.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
22.03%
Operating income growth of 22.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-15.00%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-15.45%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-15.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.59%
Share change of 0.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.48%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-43.05%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
2.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 64.87%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
-52.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 41.12%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-9.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.48%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
19.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 19.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
117.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 117.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-37.71%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
27.80%
Net income/share CAGR of 27.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
116.19%
Net income/share CAGR of 116.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
160.59%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 160.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
110.20%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 50.88% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
8.02%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
167.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.45%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
560.00%
Inventory growth of 560.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.86%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.23%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.12%
R&D growth of 4.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
1.44%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.
