229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
42.11%
Revenue growth of 42.11% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
1933.33%
Gross profit growth of 1933.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
96.90%
EBIT growth of 96.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
96.90%
Operating income growth of 96.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
120.77%
Net income growth of 120.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
120.00%
EPS growth of 120.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
120.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 120.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
2.64%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
4.64%
Diluted share change of 4.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-238.46%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-74.29%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-37.17%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 48.48%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-53.20%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 21.39%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-22.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.85%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-70.53%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
91.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 91.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-121.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-76.99%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
104.15%
Net income/share CAGR of 104.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-40.37%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
44.52%
Equity/share CAGR of 44.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
29.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 29.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
105.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.44%
AR growth of 44.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-52.38%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.41%
Asset growth of 2.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-1.89%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
1.93%
Debt growth of 1.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-0.98%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.68%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
