229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.69%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
0.69%
Gross profit growth of 0.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
10.00%
EBIT growth of 10.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
10.00%
Operating income growth of 10.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
8.20%
Net income growth of 8.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
9.68%
EPS growth of 9.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
13.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 13.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.59%
Share change of 0.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-2.25%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
933.33%
OCF growth of 933.33% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
277.78%
FCF growth of 277.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-32.46%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 13.73%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-55.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-28.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
248.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 248.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-52.02%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-34.48%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-42.95%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
87.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
-52.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -7.46%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
55.74%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.13% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
35.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
83.71%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.07%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-42.11%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.82%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.01%
BV/share growth of 1.01% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.92%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-4.63%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
