229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.17%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-3.43%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-35.23%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-35.23%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-42.42%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-44.12%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-44.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.15%
Share change of 0.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.91%
Diluted share change of 1.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.73%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-94.64%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-48.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 40.12%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-54.22%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-38.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-90.45%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-67.64%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-85.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-84.09%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
123.22%
Net income/share CAGR of 123.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-80.75%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -31.36%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
43.32%
Equity/share CAGR of 43.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
44.78%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 44.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
58.81%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.87%
AR growth of 6.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
109.09%
Inventory growth of 109.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.68%
Asset growth of 1.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.03%
BV/share growth of 1.03% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.63%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-2.59%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
7.84%
SG&A growth of 7.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
