229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.73%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-3.08%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 4.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
1.75%
EBIT growth of 1.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
1.75%
Operating income growth of 1.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
5.26%
Net income growth of 5.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
5.26%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.00%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.61%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
2.37%
Diluted share change of 2.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.24%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-783.33%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-39.46%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 27.68%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-33.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-24.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-99.57%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-98.70%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-99.43%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-79.43%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
102.81%
Net income/share CAGR of 102.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-77.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
33.65%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
129.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 129.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
42.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 42.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.32%
AR growth of 29.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
13.04%
Inventory growth of 13.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.32%
Asset growth of 2.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.59%
BV/share growth of 0.59% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.27%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-1.77%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.57%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
