229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.41%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-4.40%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-29.31%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-29.31%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-20.00%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-20.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.82%
Share change of 0.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.25%
Diluted share change of 0.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1950.00%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-65.85%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-43.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 29.03%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-41.59%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-25.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-110.75%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
87.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 87.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-133.99%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-83.37%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
143.69%
Net income/share CAGR of 143.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-87.26%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -2.30%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
31.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 31.17% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
141.35%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 141.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
10.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 10.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.80%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
30.77%
Inventory growth of 30.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.46%
Asset growth of 0.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.47%
BV/share growth of 0.47% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.61%
Debt growth of 1.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-4.50%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
0.74%
SG&A growth of 0.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
