229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.01%
Revenue growth of 2.01% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
6.56%
Gross profit growth of 6.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
54.55%
EBIT growth of 54.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
54.55%
Operating income growth of 54.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
86.67%
Net income growth of 86.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
86.36%
EPS growth of 86.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
86.36%
Diluted EPS growth of 86.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.10%
Share change of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.10%
Diluted share change of 0.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.15%
OCF growth of 34.15% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
400.00%
FCF growth of 400.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-50.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 28.18%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-33.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-43.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-5.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-40.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-73.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-102.51%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-109.10%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-102.94%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
21.68%
Equity/share CAGR of 21.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
135.88%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 135.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-16.36%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.04%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.22%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.46%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.41%
BV/share growth of 0.41% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.27%
Debt growth of 1.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
3.42%
R&D growth of 3.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
6.79%
SG&A growth of 6.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
