229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 3.25%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
2.96%
Gross profit growth 75-90% of Technology median of 3.93%. John Neff would watch if higher volumes can lift margins eventually.
-11.76%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-11.76%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 1.09%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
333.33%
Net income growth of 333.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
333.33%
EPS growth of 333.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 333.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.40%
Share change of 0.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.89%
Diluted share change of 0.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.91%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-35.56%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-50.03%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 9.42%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-23.14%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-31.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
224.11%
OCF/share CAGR of 224.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-53.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
44.55%
3Y OCF/share growth of 44.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-91.56%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-81.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-94.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -8.90%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
21.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 21.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
118.33%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 118.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-11.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.01%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.82%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.47%
Asset growth of 1.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.16%
BV/share growth of 0.16% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-3.13%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-1.65%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
0.33%
SG&A growth of 0.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
