229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.75%
Revenue growth of 4.75% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
2.39%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
53.33%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
53.33%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
35.71%
Net income growth of 35.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
28.57%
EPS growth of 28.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
28.57%
Diluted EPS growth of 28.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.08%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.42%
Diluted share change of 0.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.84%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-165.52%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-46.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 28.55%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-18.71%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-23.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
101.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 101.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-97.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-96.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
106.47%
Net income/share CAGR of 106.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-86.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-91.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -7.19%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
33.22%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
108.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 108.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-9.43%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.45%
AR growth of 15.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-7.32%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.26%
Asset growth of 1.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.34%
BV/share growth of 1.34% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.97%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
0.84%
R&D growth of 0.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.33%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
