229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.84%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 4.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-1.12%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 4.20%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
1.35%
EBIT growth near Technology median of 1.35%. Charlie Munger would expect industry-level profitability trends are driving results.
1.35%
Operating income growth below 50% of Technology median of 6.17%. Jim Chanos would suspect structural cost disadvantages.
-26.98%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 5.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-29.03%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 3.32%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-26.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 3.40%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.80%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
1.59%
Diluted share change of 1.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.15%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-85.14%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-40.15%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 20.25%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-6.85%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
26.37%
3Y CAGR of 26.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
333.64%
OCF/share CAGR of 333.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-83.07%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
231.33%
3Y OCF/share growth of 231.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
76.19%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.11% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-74.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.28%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
1.34%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
38.62%
Equity/share CAGR of 38.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
54.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 54.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
13.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 13.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.17%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-29.21%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.39%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
2.87%
BV/share growth of 2.87% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-100.00%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
3.36%
R&D growth of 3.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
0.58%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.
