229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
56.31%
Revenue growth of 56.31% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
51.11%
Gross profit growth of 51.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
79.43%
EBIT growth of 79.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
79.43%
Operating income growth of 79.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
31.40%
Net income growth of 31.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
29.95%
EPS growth of 29.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
30.51%
Diluted EPS growth of 30.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
1.13%
Share change of 1.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.74%
Diluted share change of 0.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.37%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-69.36%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
8.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 34.23%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
363.40%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
237.59%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 26.26%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-10.38%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
1867.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 1867.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
122.38%
3Y OCF/share growth of 122.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
584.91%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 31.18% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
321.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 21.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
8239.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 65.38%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
77.61%
Equity/share CAGR of 77.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
83.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 83.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
75.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.72%
AR growth of 48.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
47.88%
Inventory growth of 47.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
23.14%
Asset growth of 23.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
11.55%
BV/share growth of 11.55% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.81%
R&D growth of 23.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
34.47%
SG&A growth of 34.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
