229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.18%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-17.07%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.89%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-7.73%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-7.73%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 2.43%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-27.43%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 6.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-28.40%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 3.60%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-27.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 2.57%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.22%
Share change of 1.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.50%
Diluted share change of 0.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.17%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-258.21%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
17.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median of 21.19%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
150.73%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
153.38%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 25.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
79.69%
OCF/share CAGR of 79.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-133.84%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-209.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
132.59%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.51% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
684.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 65.39%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
2410.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 64.26%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
148.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 148.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 91.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
79.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 79.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.06%
AR growth of 49.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-16.39%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.90%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
2.36%
BV/share growth of 2.36% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.30%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.33%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
