229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.02%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-16.71%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.17%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-2.27%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2.27%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-23.31%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-23.68%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-23.65%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.62%
Share change of 0.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.38%
Diluted share change of 0.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.51%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-66.07%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
91.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.78%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
188.44%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
133.47%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.23%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
292.05%
OCF/share CAGR of 292.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
29964.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 29964.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
918.80%
3Y OCF/share growth of 918.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
144.39%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.91% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
1476.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 65.07%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
1317.28%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 21.74%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
474.74%
Equity/share CAGR of 474.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
150.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 150.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
131.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 131.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.45%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-31.35%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.85%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
8.53%
BV/share growth of 8.53% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.54%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-4.76%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
