229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.05%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 1.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-4.55%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-7.13%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-7.13%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-9.37%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-10.71%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-10.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.23%
Share change of 0.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.18%
Diluted share change of 0.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.11%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-42.26%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1373.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.45%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
437.66%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
242.19%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.41%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
2766.46%
OCF/share CAGR of 2766.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
809.38%
OCF/share CAGR of 809.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
132.05%
3Y OCF/share growth of 132.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
7484.86%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 62.13% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
1024.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
457.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 28.49%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1377.29%
Equity/share CAGR of 1377.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
605.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
228.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.20%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-12.71%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
9.00%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
10.23%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.71%
R&D growth of 2.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.74%
SG&A growth of 5.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
