229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.43%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-10.33%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.67%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-11.28%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-11.28%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.66%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-11.04%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-12.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-12.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.27%
Share change of 0.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.35%
Diluted share change of 0.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.38%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-22.68%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1884.87%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.93%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
588.14%
5Y CAGR of 588.14% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
358.24%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.12%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
529107.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 529107.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
1660.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 1660.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
1486.47%
3Y OCF/share growth of 1486.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
21902.06%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.01% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
1295.24%
Net income/share CAGR of 1295.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
820.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 33.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1833.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 1833.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
672.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 672.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
302.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 302.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.28%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-10.84%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
8.84%
Asset growth of 8.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
13.51%
BV/share growth of 13.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.95%
R&D growth of 10.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-10.21%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
