229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.62%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-19.23%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-24.77%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-24.77%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-24.08%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-22.73%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.32%
Share change of 0.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.10%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-42.04%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1765.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.55%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
499.14%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
300.86%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.20%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
21056.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 21056.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
668.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 668.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
328.30%
3Y OCF/share growth of 328.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
20884.29%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 76.53% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
898.35%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 26.18%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
585.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 32.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1991.43%
Equity/share CAGR of 1991.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
671.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 671.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
311.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 311.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.73%
AR growth of 8.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
1.81%
Inventory growth of 1.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
7.93%
Asset growth of 7.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
8.67%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.16%
R&D growth of 4.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
8.81%
SG&A growth of 8.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
