229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.01%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 4.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-22.37%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 5.76%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-27.03%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 4.25%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-27.03%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 10.93%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-27.00%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 5.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-28.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 5.56%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-26.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 5.60%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.08%
Share change of 0.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.16%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-46.62%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-51.34%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
2168.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.39%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
443.33%
5Y CAGR of 443.33% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
211.98%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
9690.16%
OCF/share CAGR of 9690.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
881.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 881.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
418.33%
3Y OCF/share growth of 418.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
52224.57%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.62% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
755.17%
Net income/share CAGR of 755.17% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
199.97%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 199.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
2411.76%
Equity/share CAGR of 2411.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
602.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 602.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
232.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.92%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-14.43%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.69%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
6.31%
BV/share growth of 6.31% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.79%
R&D growth of 10.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-5.92%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
