229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.99%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-20.34%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-26.73%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 2.01%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-26.73%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 2.76%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-27.73%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 5.40%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 4.84%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 4.76%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-2.24%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.30%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
15.43%
Dividend growth of 15.43% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-37.40%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-43.05%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1695.90%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.87%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
355.28%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
123.41%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.45%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
76762.41%
OCF/share CAGR of 76762.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
470.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 470.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
61.91%
3Y OCF/share growth of 61.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
28426.51%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 61.57% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
519.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 37.00%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
110.63%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.56%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
2208.15%
Equity/share CAGR of 2208.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
504.78%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 504.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
184.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.77%
AR growth of 24.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
36.31%
Inventory growth of 36.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.63%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-6.87%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 1.20%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.27%
R&D growth of 5.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-1.01%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
