229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
77.10%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
85.78%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
117.16%
EBIT growth of 117.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
117.16%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
112.87%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
113.89%
EPS growth of 113.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
120.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 120.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.53%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.51%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.55%
Dividend growth of 0.55% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
154.51%
OCF growth of 154.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
224.08%
FCF growth of 224.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1920.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.42%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
414.88%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
79.58%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
4013.03%
OCF/share CAGR of 4013.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
531.41%
OCF/share CAGR of 531.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
114.27%
3Y OCF/share growth of 114.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
5675.37%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 39.90% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
477.56%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
53.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1913.42%
Equity/share CAGR of 1913.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
273.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
52.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 11.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.30%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
8.15%
Inventory growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
12.96%
Asset growth of 12.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
12.28%
BV/share growth of 12.28% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
3.14%
Debt growth of 3.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
12.40%
R&D growth of 12.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
14.00%
SG&A growth of 14.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
