229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-22.24%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-20.46%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.54%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-24.61%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-24.61%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.19%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-24.72%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-23.38%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-24.68%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.84%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.24%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-43.42%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-45.48%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1646.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.36%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
371.20%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
66.98%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.63%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
3375.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 3375.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
797.94%
OCF/share CAGR of 797.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
53.98%
3Y OCF/share growth of 53.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
4468.65%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.88% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
384.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 6.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
31.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.84%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1872.51%
Equity/share CAGR of 1872.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
259.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
41.97%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.74%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
4.95%
Inventory growth of 4.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-0.27%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
5.49%
BV/share growth of 5.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
20.51%
Debt growth of 20.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
1.21%
R&D growth of 1.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-3.89%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
