229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.49%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-16.80%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-22.95%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-22.95%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.31%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-21.31%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-20.34%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-20.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.10%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.06%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
12.54%
Dividend growth of 12.54% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-21.45%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-22.32%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1303.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
252.10%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
62.06%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
3061.99%
OCF/share CAGR of 3061.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
247.90%
OCF/share CAGR of 247.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
68.31%
3Y OCF/share growth of 68.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
3232.86%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 50.33% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
265.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
38.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.83%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1734.71%
Equity/share CAGR of 1734.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
224.87%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
28.69%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.91%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-14.77%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.58%
Asset growth of 4.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-1.49%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
24.04%
Debt growth of 24.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
6.05%
R&D growth of 6.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.01%
SG&A growth of 3.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
