229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.06%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
4.41%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.70%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
3.83%
EBIT growth of 3.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
3.83%
Operating income growth of 3.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
4.19%
Net income growth of 4.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
4.26%
EPS growth of 4.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
6.52%
Diluted EPS growth of 6.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.45%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.57%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.49%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-10.09%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-23.89%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1325.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.29%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
187.01%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
66.56%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.03%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
1724.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 1724.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
168.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 168.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
71.56%
3Y OCF/share growth of 71.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
2534.31%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.87% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
192.74%
Net income/share CAGR of 192.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
57.35%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.85%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1536.22%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.07% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
183.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
17.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.48%
AR growth of 62.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
15.03%
Inventory growth of 15.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
6.29%
Asset growth of 6.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-3.63%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
18.21%
Debt growth of 18.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
9.14%
R&D growth of 9.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.96%
SG&A growth of 3.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
