229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.32%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
48.06%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
65.29%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
65.29%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
65.06%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
69.39%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
67.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-1.56%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.56%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
1.75%
Dividend growth of 1.75% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
103.81%
OCF growth of 103.81% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
138.94%
FCF growth of 138.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1280.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.81%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
228.45%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
64.56%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.84%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
10052.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 10052.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
225.30%
OCF/share CAGR of 225.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
38.61%
3Y OCF/share growth of 38.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
3299.71%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.66% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
254.01%
Net income/share CAGR of 254.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
65.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1501.27%
Equity/share CAGR of 1501.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
171.62%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
19.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.81% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-23.12%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
4.34%
Inventory growth of 4.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.01%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
9.17%
Positive BV/share change while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
-2.12%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
8.29%
R&D growth of 8.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.86%
SG&A growth of 3.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
