229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-33.37%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.32%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-34.52%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.74%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-42.13%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 3.96%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-42.13%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 6.21%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-42.73%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 7.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-42.17%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 7.51%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-42.68%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 7.92%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.80%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.95%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.47%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-57.76%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-61.62%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1138.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.45%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
140.19%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
38.30%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
10006.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 10006.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
118.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 118.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
10.66%
3Y OCF/share growth of 10.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
2637.90%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.40% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
105.84%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
31.38%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1503.98%
Equity/share CAGR of 1503.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
148.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 148.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
14.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 38.96% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-5.59%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.94%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.09%
Asset growth of 4.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.53%
BV/share growth of 2.53% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
26.86%
Debt growth of 26.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
4.45%
R&D growth of 4.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-11.04%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
