229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-32.49%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.20%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-31.76%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.58%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-39.65%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-39.65%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.54%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-38.35%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-36.90%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-38.10%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.38%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.24%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-2.69%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-53.84%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-59.88%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
1061.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.36%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
68.81%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 15.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
35.79%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.77%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
1879.69%
OCF/share CAGR of 1879.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
12.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 12.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
8.80%
3Y OCF/share growth of 8.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1555.78%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.34% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
18.67%
5Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would encourage better profitability or share buybacks to catch up with peers.
26.41%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.49%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1164.16%
Equity/share CAGR of 1164.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
63.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 63.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
30.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 32.28% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-26.33%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
7.30%
Inventory growth of 7.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.02%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.69%
BV/share growth of 2.69% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
12.53%
Debt growth of 12.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-3.31%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.78%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
