229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
67.92%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
70.15%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
100.26%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
100.26%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
87.28%
Net income growth of 87.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
88.46%
EPS growth of 88.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
86.54%
Diluted EPS growth of 86.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.71%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.50%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
2.84%
Dividend growth of 2.84% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
80.72%
OCF growth of 80.72% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
118.63%
FCF growth of 118.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1001.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.73%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
108.21%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
35.26%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
1117.33%
OCF/share CAGR of 1117.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
55.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 55.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-4.12%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
1421.86%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 45.19% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
97.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 30.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
27.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.08%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
900.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 900.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
41.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 22.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
29.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 11.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.17%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 72.17% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
36.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 36.23% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
42.68%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
-8.94%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
8.39%
Asset growth of 8.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
5.34%
BV/share growth of 5.34% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
5.81%
Debt growth of 5.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
13.68%
R&D growth of 13.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
10.93%
SG&A growth of 10.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
