229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.88%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 1.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-12.81%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.49%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-20.65%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 3.03%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-20.65%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 4.49%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-16.66%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 2.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-14.49%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 1.38%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-14.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 1.99%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-2.84%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.80%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
17.86%
Dividend growth of 17.86% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-4.24%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
2.62%
FCF growth of 2.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
804.23%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.45%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
98.61%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
26.02%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
1289.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 1289.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
143.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 143.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
13.45%
3Y OCF/share growth of 13.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1261.54%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 62.83% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
119.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 29.97%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
26.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
642.29%
Equity/share CAGR of 642.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
22.74%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
7.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff calls for overhead or margin tweaks to keep pace with peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.16%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 71.16% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
40.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.43% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
17.67%
AR growth of 17.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-22.53%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-4.98%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-6.75%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.45%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-5.94%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
9.56%
R&D growth of 9.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-1.01%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
