229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.09%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.06%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
17.94%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
27.80%
EBIT growth of 27.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
27.80%
Operating income growth of 27.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
22.62%
Net income growth of 22.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
25.42%
EPS growth of 25.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
25.86%
Diluted EPS growth of 25.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.65%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.60%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.75%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
34.75%
OCF growth of 34.75% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
46.89%
FCF growth of 46.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
930.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.57%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
121.26%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
43.64%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
487.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 487.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
159.73%
OCF/share CAGR of 159.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
70.39%
3Y OCF/share growth of 70.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1508.05%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 55.04% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
147.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 27.42%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
49.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 25.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
521.47%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.82% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
14.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees subpar net worth creation vs. competitors.
5.58%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.04%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 68.04% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
40.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.06% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
85.82%
AR growth of 85.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-33.36%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.73%
Asset growth of 4.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-5.22%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.10%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
1.32%
R&D growth of 1.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
2.63%
SG&A growth of 2.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
