229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-31.19%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-31.88%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.77%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-42.54%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-42.54%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-42.09%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-40.95%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-41.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.30%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.52%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-2.23%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-58.21%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-62.32%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
848.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.76%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
66.51%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
35.38%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.62%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
1670.28%
OCF/share CAGR of 1670.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
7.95%
OCF/share CAGR of 7.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
13.44%
3Y OCF/share growth of 13.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1180.49%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 41.13% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
48.15%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.52%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
29.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
481.16%
Equity/share CAGR of 481.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
15.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-4.27%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 10.80%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.50%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 69.50% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
39.97%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 39.97% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-28.94%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.09%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-8.49%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-9.02%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-1.83%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
1.18%
R&D growth of 1.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-6.79%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
