229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.25%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-7.30%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.40%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-11.53%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-11.53%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.67%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-13.12%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-11.29%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-9.84%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-2.21%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.11%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
7.79%
Dividend growth of 7.79% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
4.31%
OCF growth of 4.31% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
9.60%
FCF growth of 9.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
783.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.09%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
89.10%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
51.28%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.36%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
601.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 601.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
49.26%
OCF/share CAGR of 49.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
30.31%
3Y OCF/share growth of 30.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1018.60%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 40.74% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
70.53%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
53.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
409.98%
Equity/share CAGR of 409.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
4.92%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
-9.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 11.98%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.51%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
35.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.60% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
0.75%
AR growth of 0.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-31.31%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-5.78%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-6.82%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.45%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-3.74%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
7.83%
R&D growth of 7.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.72%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
