229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.01%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.62%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
20.20%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.72%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
31.66%
EBIT growth of 31.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
31.66%
Operating income growth of 31.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
36.26%
Net income growth of 36.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
38.18%
EPS growth of 38.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
38.18%
Diluted EPS growth of 38.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.75%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.76%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-2.43%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
71.11%
OCF growth of 71.11% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
77.80%
FCF growth of 77.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
808.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 31.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
100.88%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 15.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
63.35%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.76%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
796.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 796.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
98.55%
OCF/share CAGR of 98.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
47.55%
3Y OCF/share growth of 47.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1050.61%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.97% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
113.58%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
81.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 81.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
300.33%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 25.65% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
7.19%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
-15.68%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 13.96%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.49%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 62.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
34.47%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 34.47% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
73.02%
AR growth of 73.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
22.38%
Inventory growth of 22.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
5.05%
Asset growth of 5.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-4.52%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.34%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-3.45%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
3.43%
SG&A growth of 3.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
