229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.35%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Technology median of 4.55%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
1.39%
Gross profit growth below 50% of Technology median of 6.09%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental margin deterioration.
1.85%
EBIT growth below 50% of Technology median of 9.69%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental operating challenges.
1.85%
Operating income growth below 50% of Technology median of 10.18%. Jim Chanos would suspect structural cost disadvantages.
0.04%
Net income growth below 50% of Technology median of 10.41%. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper profitability issues.
1.56%
EPS growth below 50% of Technology median of 11.33%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental earnings weakness or heavy dilution.
1.56%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of Technology median of 11.11%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental profit weaknesses or heavy share issuance.
-1.09%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.13%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
9.52%
Dividend growth of 9.52% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
22.24%
OCF growth of 22.24% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
28.35%
FCF growth of 28.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
462.88%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 15.29%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
59.86%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
58.34%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.97%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
401.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 401.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
44.24%
OCF/share CAGR of 44.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
126.02%
3Y OCF/share growth of 126.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
412.19%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.57% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
40.03%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 18.41%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
55.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.54%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
148.25%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.92% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-23.58%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 6.46%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-34.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 4.39%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.11%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 59.11% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
30.88%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.88% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
4.56%
AR growth of 4.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
19.32%
Inventory growth of 19.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-0.95%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-6.82%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 1.08%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
2.94%
Debt growth of 2.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
4.23%
R&D growth of 4.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.44%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
