229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
72.24%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
79.55%
Gross profit growth of 79.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
126.96%
EBIT growth of 126.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
126.96%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
126.90%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
129.73%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
130.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-0.72%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
3.65%
Dividend growth of 3.65% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
88.39%
OCF growth of 88.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
87.65%
FCF growth of 87.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
533.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.79%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
92.85%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
52.42%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.44%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
502.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 502.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
85.32%
OCF/share CAGR of 85.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
65.45%
3Y OCF/share growth of 65.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
627.94%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 46.52% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
105.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 55.21%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
73.07%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
84.13%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.02% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-32.21%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 34.31%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-42.96%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 18.35%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.78%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 59.78% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
30.67%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.67% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
56.55%
AR growth of 56.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
22.46%
Inventory growth of 22.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
9.31%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.09%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-0.35%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
3.72%
R&D growth of 3.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
14.08%
SG&A growth of 14.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
