229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.61%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 4.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-14.10%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 4.26%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-17.98%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-17.98%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.22%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-17.82%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-17.06%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-16.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.07%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.08%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-3.56%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-38.13%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-38.43%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
460.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.95%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
133.29%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
75.80%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.59%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
494.97%
OCF/share CAGR of 494.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
172.16%
OCF/share CAGR of 172.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
90.16%
3Y OCF/share growth of 90.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
508.98%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 23.40% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
195.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 32.53%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
105.10%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.21%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
73.62%
Equity/share CAGR of 73.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-30.18%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.68%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-34.59%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.47%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.39%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
29.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.64% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-43.64%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
4.95%
Inventory growth of 4.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.77%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
5.59%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
8.57%
Debt growth of 8.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
1.92%
R&D growth of 1.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-5.63%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
