229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.37%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 6.02%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-0.23%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.78%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-1.41%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-1.41%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-5.49%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-4.58%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-4.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.86%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.87%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-2.54%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-4.24%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-10.65%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
364.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.32%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
131.67%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
54.39%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.02%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
205.35%
OCF/share CAGR of 205.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
63.10%
OCF/share CAGR of 63.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
20.53%
3Y OCF/share growth of 20.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
389.18%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 23.90% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
196.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.24%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
69.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
29.82%
Equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees subpar expansion vs. peers’ net worth growth.
-35.95%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 34.88%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-31.41%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 22.27%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.29%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 53.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
20.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 20.12% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
51.90%
AR growth of 51.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
27.08%
Inventory growth of 27.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
6.42%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-1.00%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.61%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
2.40%
Debt growth of 2.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.96%
R&D growth of 0.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.77%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.
