229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.69%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
54.21%
Gross profit growth of 54.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
74.42%
EBIT growth of 74.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
74.42%
Operating income growth of 74.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
68.51%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
68.80%
EPS growth of 68.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
69.35%
Diluted EPS growth of 69.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.58%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.70%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
3.12%
Dividend growth of 3.12% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
132.50%
OCF growth of 132.50% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
160.13%
FCF growth of 160.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
325.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.61%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
104.54%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 26.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
69.89%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.97%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
325.51%
OCF/share CAGR of 325.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
122.98%
OCF/share CAGR of 122.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
103.36%
3Y OCF/share growth of 103.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
321.58%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 57.32% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
150.28%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 39.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
100.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 28.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
27.03%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
-29.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 39.01%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-29.49%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 23.05%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.17%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.17% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
20.88%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 20.88% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
26.69%
AR growth of 26.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-10.70%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
8.60%
Asset growth of 8.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
14.68%
BV/share growth of 14.68% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.54%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
9.25%
R&D growth of 9.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
14.83%
SG&A growth of 14.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
