229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-21.52%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-21.54%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.44%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-27.74%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-27.74%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-27.78%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-27.01%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-27.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.69%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.70%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-3.00%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-40.03%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-41.92%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
298.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.66%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
136.15%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
92.58%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.77%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
223.59%
OCF/share CAGR of 223.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
187.73%
OCF/share CAGR of 187.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
189.99%
3Y OCF/share growth of 189.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
245.56%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.10% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
191.18%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.23%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
148.46%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
5.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 5.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-35.45%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 3.60%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-26.88%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.64%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.67%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 53.67% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
19.92%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.92% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-30.42%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-7.08%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-8.01%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-5.65%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-2.29%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
1.28%
R&D growth of 1.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-3.97%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
