229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.72%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 1.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-15.68%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.06%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-23.03%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 1.28%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-23.03%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 3.28%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-22.26%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 1.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-22.08%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.80%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-21.05%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.85%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.71%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.86%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
6.77%
Dividend growth of 6.77% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-18.72%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-18.95%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
284.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.56%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
134.89%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
74.39%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.73%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
264.54%
OCF/share CAGR of 264.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
239.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 239.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
122.53%
3Y OCF/share growth of 122.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
257.49%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.52% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
186.75%
Net income/share CAGR of 186.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
118.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 118.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-15.63%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-43.59%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 5.75%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-31.86%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 8.32%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.61%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 45.61% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
18.79%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 18.79% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-6.96%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-0.49%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-4.09%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-13.17%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.23%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.24%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
6.42%
R&D growth of 6.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.92%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
