229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.66%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
6.16%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.97%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
7.88%
EBIT growth of 7.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
7.88%
Operating income growth of 7.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
6.58%
Net income growth of 6.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
7.50%
EPS growth of 7.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
7.50%
Diluted EPS growth of 7.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.82%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.88%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-2.03%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
5.39%
OCF growth of 5.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
0.23%
FCF growth of 0.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
310.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 26.19%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
120.30%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
57.74%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.05%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
332.84%
OCF/share CAGR of 332.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
98.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 98.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
35.79%
3Y OCF/share growth of 35.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
313.01%
Net income/share CAGR of 313.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
148.50%
Net income/share CAGR of 148.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
69.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.87%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-29.74%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 41.41%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-51.43%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 26.17%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-37.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 18.64%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.51%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 45.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
19.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.27% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
44.25%
AR growth of 44.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-8.96%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.89%
Asset growth of 4.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-12.07%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.32%
Debt growth of 0.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-0.53%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
7.12%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.
