229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.05%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-16.60%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.71%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-21.37%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-21.37%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-19.46%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-19.05%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-19.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.66%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-2.48%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-16.01%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-15.14%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
262.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.90%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
97.49%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
79.66%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
280.64%
OCF/share CAGR of 280.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
140.33%
OCF/share CAGR of 140.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
137.03%
3Y OCF/share growth of 137.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
321.74%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.54% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
122.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 6.27%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
137.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-23.55%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-37.63%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 4.68%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-12.44%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 8.62%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
144.19%
Dividend/share CAGR of 144.19% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
45.67%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 45.67% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
19.47%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.47% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-33.74%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
9.71%
Inventory growth of 9.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.21%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
10.31%
BV/share growth of 10.31% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.35%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-3.27%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-6.14%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
