229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.41%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.14%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
11.02%
Gross profit growth of 11.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
17.27%
EBIT growth of 17.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
17.27%
Operating income growth of 17.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
15.47%
Net income growth of 15.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
15.75%
EPS growth of 15.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
15.87%
Diluted EPS growth of 15.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.63%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.65%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.75%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-18.13%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-19.98%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
287.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.92%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
75.19%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
51.26%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 15.68%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
253.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 253.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
36.21%
OCF/share CAGR of 36.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
14.78%
3Y OCF/share growth of 14.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
395.95%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.83% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
100.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.62%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
98.07%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.09%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-18.37%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 42.22%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-28.59%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 23.74%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
4.00%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
120.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 120.26% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
31.07%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 31.07% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
17.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 17.04% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
55.63%
AR growth of 55.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-13.88%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
5.24%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
3.75%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
13.41%
Debt growth of 13.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-1.81%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
2.98%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.
