229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
33.61%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
35.69%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
49.70%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
49.70%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
47.74%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
48.98%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
49.32%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-0.57%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.61%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
2.37%
Dividend growth of 2.37% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
84.72%
OCF growth of 84.72% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
92.97%
FCF growth of 92.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
235.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.98%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
73.23%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
17.16%
3Y revenue/share growth near Technology median of 16.61%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
184.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 184.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
82.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 82.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
12.38%
3Y OCF/share growth of 12.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
319.72%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.81% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
107.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 37.04%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
28.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.33%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-7.57%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 40.21%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-23.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 25.49%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
22.18%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
123.46%
Dividend/share CAGR of 123.46% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
30.94%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.94% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
15.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 15.60% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-17.85%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.84%
Inventory growth of 2.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.26%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
19.92%
BV/share growth of 19.92% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-12.82%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
5.32%
R&D growth of 5.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
10.32%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.
