229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.10%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 1.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-22.94%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.19%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-30.89%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.06%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-30.89%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 2.65%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-30.31%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-30.14%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-29.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.67%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-2.35%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-43.13%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-44.82%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
216.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
89.84%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
10.17%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 12.68%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
166.46%
OCF/share CAGR of 166.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
146.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 146.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
2.89%
3Y OCF/share growth of 2.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
267.58%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.03% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
148.11%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.46%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
8.78%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.80%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-1.85%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-14.94%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 9.76%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
16.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
121.66%
Dividend/share CAGR of 121.66% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
30.77%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.77% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
17.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 17.04% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-17.87%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-4.29%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-4.56%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.80%
BV/share growth of 0.80% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-3.19%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
2.69%
R&D growth of 2.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-4.69%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
