229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.48%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 1.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-6.13%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.69%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-9.13%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 7.39%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-9.13%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 5.36%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-9.26%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 8.83%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-8.50%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 9.13%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-8.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 9.13%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.56%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.75%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
5.57%
Dividend growth of 5.57% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
27.18%
OCF growth of 27.18% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
29.06%
FCF growth of 29.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
259.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 26.39%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
90.24%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
14.34%
3Y revenue/share growth near Technology median of 13.65%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
341.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 341.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
195.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 195.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
48.50%
3Y OCF/share growth of 48.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
334.57%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 39.93% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
154.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 38.96%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
7.07%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
-13.41%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 11.95%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-17.47%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 13.36%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
12.65%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
113.28%
Dividend/share CAGR of 113.28% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
28.08%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.08% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
12.24%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 12.24% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
4.91%
AR growth of 4.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-1.08%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.72%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-9.59%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 1.06%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-3.14%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
1.30%
R&D growth of 1.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.29%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
