229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.67%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.87%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
10.59%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.16%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
16.72%
EBIT growth of 16.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
16.72%
Operating income growth of 16.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-31.29%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-30.71%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-30.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.97%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.69%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.38%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-7.09%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-10.50%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
252.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.38%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
75.51%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
23.75%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
216.56%
OCF/share CAGR of 216.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
59.44%
OCF/share CAGR of 59.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
44.23%
3Y OCF/share growth of 44.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
172.27%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 47.62% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
27.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier might question fundamental disadvantages in cost structure or growth drivers.
-22.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 20.34%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-20.13%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 42.97%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-25.48%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 27.24%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-1.91%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.58%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
110.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 110.36% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
29.46%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.46% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
13.56%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 13.56% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
53.44%
Receivables growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
18.18%
Inventory growth of 18.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
10.06%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-13.80%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.38%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
5.26%
Debt growth of 5.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-3.01%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
3.21%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.
